Correlation Between Volume and Pressure of Intracranial Space With Craniectomy Surface Area and Brain Herniation: A Phantom-Based Study.

There are proponents of decompressive craniectomy (DC) and its various modifications who claim reasonable clinical outcomes for each of them. Clinical outcome in cases of traumatic brain injury, managed conservatively or aided by different surgical techniques, depends on multiple factors, which vary widely among patients and have complex interplay, making it difficult to compare one case with another in absolute terms. This forms the basis of the perceived necessity to have a standard model to study, compare, and strategize in this field. We designed a phantom-based model and present the findings of the study aimed at establishing a correlation of the volume of intracranial space and changes in intracranial pressure (ICP) with surface area of the craniectomy defect created during DC and brain herniation volume. A roughly hemispherical radio-opaque container was scanned on a 128-slice computed tomography scanner. Craniectomies of different sizes and shapes were marked on the walls of the phantom. Two spherical sacs of stretchable materials were subsequently placed inside the phantom, fixed to three-way connectors, filled with water, and connected with transducers. The terminals of the transducer cables were coupled with the display monitor through a signal amplifier and processor module. Parts of the wall of the phantom were removed to let portions of the sac herniate through the defect, simulating a DC. Volume measurements using AW volume share 7® software were done. Resection of a 12.7 × 11.5 cm part of the wall resulted in a 10-cm-diameter defect in the wall. Volume differential of 35 mL created a midline shift of 5 mm to the side with lesser volume. When measuring pressure in two stretchable sacs contained inside the phantom, there always remained a pressure differential ranging from 1 to 2 mm Hg in different recordings, even with sacs on both sides containing an equal volume of fluids. Creating a circular wall defect of 10 cm in diameter with an intracavitary pressure of 35 mm Hg on the ipsilateral sac and 33 mm on the contralateral sac recorded with intact walls, resulted in a true volume expansion of 48.411 cm3. The herniation resulted in a reduction of pressure in both sacs, with the pressure recorded as 25 mm in the ipsilateral sac and 24 mm in the contralateral sac. The findings closely matched those of the other model-based studies. Refinement of the materials used is likely to provide a valid platform to study cranial volume, ICP, craniectomy size, and brain prolapse volume in real time. The model will help in pre-operatively choosing the most appropriate technique between a classical DC, a hinge craniotomy, and an expansive cranioplasty technique in cases of refractory raised ICP.

Establishment of a model to predict mortality after decompression craniotomy for traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: The mortality rate of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) is still high even while undergoing decompressive craniectomy (DC), and the expensive treatment costs bring huge economic burden to the families of patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify preoperative indicators that influence patient outcomes and to develop a risk model for predicting patient mortality by a retrospective analysis of TBI patients undergoing DC. METHODS: A total of 288 TBI patients treated with DC, admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical School from August 2015 to April 2021, were used for univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine the risk factors for death after DC in TBI patients. We also built a risk model for the identified risk factors and conducted internal verification and model evaluation. RESULTS: Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis identified four risk factors: Glasgow Coma Scale, age, activated partial thrombin time, and mean CT value of the superior sagittal sinus. These risk factors can be obtained before DC. In addition, we also developed a 3-month mortality risk model and conducted a bootstrap 1000 resampling internal validation, with C-indices of 0.852 and 0.845, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a risk model that has clinical significance for the early identification of patients who will still die after DC. Interestingly, we also identified a new early risk factor for TBI patients after DC, that is, preoperative mean CT value of the superior sagittal sinus (p < .05).

Comparing surgical outcomes: Craniotomy versus decompressive craniectomy in acute subdural hematoma - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Acute subdural hematomas (SDH) pose a significant health risk, often resulting from traumatic head injuries. The choice between surgical interventions, craniotomy, and decompressive craniectomy, remains a subject of debate. This meta-analysis aims to compare outcomes and guide clinical decision-making. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in databases such as Ovid Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane, up to December 2023. Selection criteria included studies comparing craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy for acute SDH. Data extraction utilized the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Tool, and statistical analysis employed the random-effects model. Results: The meta-analysis included 17 studies and 6848 patients. Craniotomy demonstrated a significant reduction in mortality rates (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.89, P < 0.0001). GCS scores favored craniotomy for severe cases. GOS outcomes showed a trend favoring craniotomy, particularly in good recovery (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.04-1.74, P = 0.03). Additional factors explored included co-existing sub-epidural hematoma, mydriasis, extracranial injuries, residual SDH, revision rates, and intracranial pressure. Conclusion: The meta-analysis suggests that craniotomy may be a favorable surgical strategy for acute SDH, displaying a significant decrease in mortality rates and a lower risk of raised intracranial pressure. However, the nuanced nature of outcomes emphasizes the need for a tailored approach, considering broader clinical contexts. Future research should address limitations and provide a basis for well-informed clinical decision-making.

Decompressive craniectomy for patients with malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery: a pooled analysis of two randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) reduces mortality without increasing the risk of very severe disability among patients with life-threatening massive cerebral infarction. However, its efficacy was demonstrated before the era of endovascular thrombectomy trials. It remains uncertain whether DC improves the prognosis of patients with malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction receiving endovascular therapy. METHODS: We pooled data from two trials (DEVT and RESCUE BT studies in China) and patients with malignant MCA infarction were included to assess outcomes and heterogeneity of DC therapy effect. Patients with herniation were dichotomized into DC and conservative groups according to their treatment strategy. The primary outcome was the rate of mortality at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included disability level at 90 days as measured by the modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) and quality-of-life score. The associations of DC with clinical outcomes were performed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 98 patients with herniation, 37 received DC surgery and 61 received conservative treatment. The median (interquartile range) was 70 (62-76) years and 40.8% of the patients were women. The mortality rate at 90 days was 59.5% in the DC group compared with 85.2% in the conservative group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.31 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.10-0.94]; P=0.04). There were 21.6% of patients in the DC group and 6.6% in the conservative group who had a mRS score of 4 (moderately severe disability); and 10.8% and 4.9%, respectively, had a score of 5 (severe disability). The quality-of-life score was higher in the DC group (0.00 [0.00-0.14] vs 0.00 [0.00-0.00], P=0.004), but DC treatment was not associated with better quality-of-life score in multivariable analyses (adjusted ß Coefficient, 0.02 [95% CI, -0.08-0.11]; p=0.75). CONCLUSIONS: DC was associated with decreased mortality among patients with malignant MCA infarction who received endovascular therapy. The majority of survivors remained moderately severe disability and required improvement on quality of life. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The DEVT trial: http://www.chictr.org. Identifier, ChiCTR-IOR-17013568. The RESCUE BT trial: URL: http://www.chictr.org. Identifier, ChiCTR-INR-17014167.

Paradoxical herniation associated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy after decompressive craniectomy: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Whether hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) can cause paradoxical herniation is still unclear. CASE SUMMARY: A 65-year-old patient who was comatose due to brain trauma underwent decompressive craniotomy and gradually regained consciousness after surgery. HBOT was administered 22 d after surgery due to speech impairment. Paradoxical herniation appeared on the second day after treatment, and the patient's condition worsened after receiving mannitol treatment at the rehabilitation hospital. After timely skull repair, the paradoxical herniation was resolved, and the patient regained consciousness and had a good recovery as observed at the follow-up visit. CONCLUSION: Paradoxical herniation is rare and may be caused by HBOT. However, the underlying mechanism is unknown, and the understanding of this phenomenon is insufficient. The use of mannitol may worsen this condition. Timely skull repair can treat paradoxical herniation and prevent serious complications.

Trends and Predictors of Decompressive Craniectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke, 2011-2020.

INTRODUCTION: Rates of decompressive craniectomy (DC) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) have been reported to decline over time, attributed to an increase in endovascular therapy (EVT) preventing the development of malignant cerebral edema. We sought to characterize trends in DC in AIS between 2011 and 2020. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study of U.S. AIS hospitalizations using the National Inpatient Sample, 2011 to 2020. We calculated rates of DC per 10,000 AIS among all AIS hospitalizations, as well as AIS hospitalizations undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). A logistic regression to determine predictors of DC was performed. RESULTS: Of ∼4.4 million AIS hospitalizations, 0.5% underwent DC; of ∼300,000 AIS with IMV, 5.8% underwent DC. From 2011 to 2020, the rate of DC increased from 37.4 to 59.1 per 10,000 AIS (p<0.001). The rate of DC in patients undergoing IMV remained stable at ∼550 per 10,000 (p=0.088). The most important factors predicting DC were age (OR 4.88, 95% CI 4.53-5.25), hospital stroke volume (OR 2.61, 95% CI 2.17-3.14), hospital teaching status (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.36-1.75), and transfer status (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.41-1.66); EVT status did not predict DC. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of DC in AIS has increased between 2011 and 2020. Our findings are contrary to prior reports of decreasing DC rates over time. Increasing EVT rates do not seem to be preventing the occurrence of DC. Future research should focus on the decision-making process for both clinicians and surrogates regarding DC with consideration of long-term outcomes.

Emergent Management of Severe Hypothermia, Acidemia, and Coagulopathy in Operative Penetrating Ballistic Cranial Trauma.

Hypothermia in a trauma patient has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality and is more frequently seen in those sustaining traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). Acidosis is an important consequence of hypothermia that leads to derangements across the spectrum of the coagulation cascade. Here, we present a case of a 31-year-old male presented after suffering a right parietal penetrating ballistic injury with an associated subdural hematoma and 7 mm midline shift requiring decompressive craniectomy and external ventricular drain (EVD) placement in the setting of severe hypothermia (28°C) and acidosis (pH 7.12). With aggressive rewarming intraoperatively, the use of full-body forced-air warming, warmed IV fluids, and increasing the ambient room temperature, the patient's acidosis and hypothermia improved to pH 7.20 and 34°C. Despite these aggressive attempts to rewarm the patient, he developed coagulopathy in the setting of concurrent hypothermia and acidosis. This case highlights the importance of prompt reversal of hypothermia due to its potentially fatal effects, particularly in the setting of severe TBIs. We discuss the critical aspects of surgical management of the injury and anesthetic management of hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy perioperatively.

Innovative Solutions for Patients Who Undergo Craniectomy: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a widely used procedure to alleviate high intracranial pressure. Multidisciplinary teams have designed and implemented external medical prototypes to improve patient life quality and avoid complications following DC in patients awaiting cranioplasty (CP), including 3D printing and plaster prototypes when available. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to understand the extent and type of evidence about innovative external prototypes for patients who undergo DC while awaiting CP. METHODS: This scoping review will use the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. This scoping review will include noninvasive medical devices for adult patients who undergo DC while waiting for CP. The search strategy will be implemented in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scielo, Scopus, and the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Health Index Medicus. Patent documents were also allocated in Espacenet, Google Patents, and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) database. RESULTS: This scoping review is not subject to ethical approval as there will be no involvement of patients. The dissemination plan includes publishing the review findings in a peer-reviewed journal and presenting results at conferences that engage the most pertinent stakeholders in innovation and neurosurgery. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review will serve as a baseline to provide evidence for multidisciplinary teams currently designing these noninvasive innovations to reduce the risk of associated complications after DC, hoping that more cost-effective models can be implemented, especially in low- and middle-income countries. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/50647.

Customised pre-operative cranioplasty to achieve maximal surgical resection of tumours with osseous involvement-a case series.

PURPOSE: Surgical resection with bony margins would be the treatment of choice for tumours with osseous involvement such as meningiomas and metastasis. By developing and designing pre-operative customised 3D modelled implants, the patient can undergo resection of meningioma and repair of bone defect in the same operation. We present a generalisable method for designing pre-operative cranioplasty in patients to repair the bone defect after the resection of tumours. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included six patients who presented with a tumour that was associated with overlying bone involvement. They underwent placement of customised cranioplasty in the same setting. A customised implant using a pre-operative imaging was designed with a 2-cm margin to allow for any intra-operative requirements for extending the craniectomy. RESULTS: Six patients were evaluated in this case series. Four patients had meningiomas, 1 patient had metastatic breast cancer on final histology, and 1 patient was found to have an intra-osseous arteriovenous malformation. Craniectomy based on margins provided by a cutting guide was fashioned. After tumour removal and haemostasis, the cranioplasty was then placed. All patients recovered well post-operatively with satisfactory cosmetic results. No wound infection was reported in our series. CONCLUSION: Our series demonstrate the feasibility of utilising pre-designed cranioplasty for meningiomas and other tumours with osseous involvement. Following strict infection protocols, minimal intra-operative handling/modification of the implant, and close follow-up has resulted in good cosmetic outcomes with no implant-related infections.

Perioperative risk factors for major complications after bone replacement in decompressive craniectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Bone flap replacement after a decompressive craniectomy is a low complexity procedure, but with complications that can negatively impact the patient's outcome. A better knowledge of the risk factors for these complications could reduce their incidence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of a series of 50 patients who underwent bone replacement after decompressive craniectomy at a tertiary center over a 10-year period was performed. Those clinical variables related to complications after replacement were recorded and their risk factors were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients (36%) presented complications after bone flap replacement, of which 10 (55.5%) required a new surgery for their treatment. Most of the replacements (95%) were performed in the first 90 days after the craniectomy, with a tendency to present more complications compared to the subsequent period (37.8% vs 20%, p > 0.05). The most frequent complication was subdural hygroma, which appeared later than infection, the second most frequent complication. The need for ventricular drainage or tracheostomy and the mean time on mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, or waiting until bone replacement were greater in patients who presented post-replacement complications. Previous infections outside the nervous system or the surgical wound was the only risk factor for post-bone flap replacement complications (p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative complications were recorded in more than a third of the patients who underwent cranial bone flap replacement, and at least half of them required a new surgery. A specific protocol aimed at controlling previous infections could reduce the risk of complications and help establish the optimal time for cranial bone flap replacement.

Is cranioplasty the optimal treatment for contralateral subdural effusion after decompressive craniectomy?: a case report.

Introduction and importance: Contralateral subdural effusion (CSDE) is a rare complication secondary to decompressive craniectomy (DC), which can lead to encephalocele and neurologic deterioration. The authors report a case that confirm the existence of unidirectional membrane valve, and cranioplasty is an effective treatment for CSDE. Case presentation: The authors reported a case of 43-year-old female was diagnosed with ruptured intracranial aneurysm and treated with interventional embolization. She underwent DC because of postoperative cerebral infarction subsequently. Her conscious state deteriorated accompanied by encephalocele in postoperative 2 week. A craniocerebral computed tomography (CT) confirmed the diagnosis of CSDE with cerebral hernia. A compression bandaging of the skull defect was applicated, whereas, her conscious state progressive deteriorated. She was transferred to the author's hospital where she underwent burr-hole drainage and clinical symptom has been improved. However, a relapse of CSDE was observed after the removal of drainage tube. Continuous lumbar drainage was employed, and which was ineffective for CSDE in this case. Finally, she underwent cranioplasty, with the help of drainage of subdural effusion, CSDE was completely resolved. Clinical discussion: CSDE is occasionally observed in patients after DC. Intracranial pressure (ICP) gradient and unidirectional membrane valve are the possible mechanisms of CSDE. At present, there is no optimal therapy for CSDE. For symptomatic CSDE patients, one or more treatment measures should be applicated. Conclusion: Cranioplasty is one of the curative and optimal method to treat symptomatic CSDE patients, early cranioplasty combined with burr-hole drainage should be performed for conservative treatment failed and intractable cases.

Functional outcome after late cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a single-center retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: The best time for cranioplasty (CP) after decompressive craniectomy (DC) is controversial, and there are no authoritative guidelines yet. Both complications as well as outcome may depend on the timing of CP. The aim of this single-center study was to evaluate the impact of late CP on procedural safety as well as on patient outcome. METHODS: All patients receiving CP at a tertiary university medical center between 01/2015 and 12/2022 were included retrospectively. Patients' conditions were assessed according to the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) prior to CP and 6 months after. Baseline characteristics, indication for DC, time from DC to CP, and postoperative complications according to the Landriel Ibañez Classification were analyzed. RESULTS: CP was performed in 271 patients who previously underwent DC due to traumatic brain injury (25.5%), ischemic stroke (29.5%), aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (26.9%), or intracerebral hemorrhage (18.1%). The median interval between DC and CP was 143 days (interquartile range 112-184 days). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed a cut-off of 149 days, where CP performed within 149 days after DC led to an improvement on mRS after CP (p = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, additional rehabilitation after and better mRS before CP were independently associated with improvement of outcome. The rate of complications was similar between early and late CP (24.8% and 25.4%, respectively, p = 0.562). CONCLUSIONS: Late cranioplasty is a safe procedure. The outcome was improved when additional rehabilitation was performed after cranioplasty and was not associated with the timing of cranioplasty.

Health-related quality of life measures in patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury: a 6-year follow-up analysis.

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the long-term neurological outcomes and the functionality and QoL in patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury, respectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among the 120 patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy for severe TBI between 2002 and 2007, 101 were included based on the inclusion criteria. Long-term follow-up results (minimum 3 years) were available for 22 patients. The outcomes were assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and the functionality and HRQoL were assessed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) (v2) and Quality of Life After Brain Injury (QoLIBRI) questionnaires. RESULTS: Among the patients with severe TBI, 62 (61.4%) died and 39 (38.6%) were discharged to either home or a physical therapy facility. Eleven of the thirty-nine patients could not be reached and were excluded from the final analysis. The mean GOS of the remaining 28 patients was 4.14 ± 0.8 after 6.46 ± 1.64 years of follow-up. The HRQoL was assessed in 22 of the 28 patients. The HRQoL scores were lower in patients with TBI than in healthy controls. Furthermore, there was a significant difference in the HRQoL scores in patients with improved GOS scores than in those with unimproved GOS scores. CONCLUSIONS: Health-related outcome scores could help clinicians understand the requirements of survivors of severe TBI to create a realistic rehabilitation target for them. QoLIBRI served as a good way of communication in these subjects.

Correlation between Transcranial Ultrasound and CT Head to Detect Clinically Significant Conditions in Post-craniectomy Patients Performed by Emergency Physician: A Pilot Study.

Background: The main objective is to detect clinically significant conditions by transcranial ultrasound (TCS) in post-decompressive craniectomy (DC) patients who come to the emergency department. Materials and methods: This was a cross-sectional observational study. We studied 40 post-DC patients. After primary stabilization, TCS was done. Computer tomography of head was done within 2 hours of performing TCS. The correlation between both modalities were assessed by the measurement of lateral ventricle (LV) (Bland-Altman plot), Midline shift and mass lesion. Additionally, normal cerebral anatomy, 3rd and 4th ventricles and external ventricular drainage (EVD) catheter visualization were also done. Results: About 14/40 patients came with non-neurosurgical complaints and 26/40 patients came with neurosurgical complaints. Patients with non-neurosurgical complaints (4/14) had mass lesions and 1/14 had MLS. Patients with neurosurgical complaints (11/26) had mass lesions and about 5 patients had MLS. A good correlation was found between TCS and CT of head in measuring LV right (CT head = 17.4 ± 13.8 mm and TCS = 17.1 ± 14.8 mm. The mean difference (95% CI) = [0.28 (-1.9 to 1.33), ICC 0.93 (0.88-0.96)], Left [CT head = 17.8 ± 14.4 mm and TCS = 17.1 ± 14.2 mm, the mean difference (95% CI) 0.63 (-1.8 to 0.61), ICC 0.96 (0.93-0.98)], MLS [CT head = 6.16 ± 3.59 (n = 7) and TCS = 7.883 ± 4.17 (n = 6)] and mass lesions (kappa 0.84 [0.72-0.89] [95% CI] p-value < 0.001). The agreement between both modalities for detecting mass lesions is 93.75%. Conclusion: Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is a bedside, easily operable, non-radiation hazard and dynamic imaging tool that can be used for TCS as a supplement to CT head in post-DC patients in emergency as well as in ICU. However, assessment of the ventricular system (pre/post-EVD insertion), monitoring of regression/progression of mass lesion, etc. can be done with TCS. Repeated scans are possible in less time which can decrease the frequency of CT head. How to cite this article: Chouhan R, Sinha TP, Bhoi S, Kumar A, Agrawal D, Nayer J, et al. Correlation between Transcranial Ultrasound and CT Head to Detect Clinically Significant Conditions in Post-craniectomy Patients Performed by Emergency Physician: A Pilot Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(3):299-306.

Poroelastic modelling of brain tissue swelling and decompressive craniectomy treatment in ischaemic stroke.

Brain oedema or tissue swelling that develops after ischaemic stroke can cause detrimental effects, including brain herniation and increased intracranial pressure (ICP). These effects can be reduced by performing a decompressive craniectomy (DC) operation, in which a portion of the skull is removed to allow swollen brain tissue to expand outside the skull. In this study, a poroelastic model is used to investigate the effect of brain ischaemic infarct size and location on the severity of brain tissue swelling. Furthermore, the model will also be used to evaluate the effectiveness of DC surgery as a treatment for brain tissue swelling after ischaemia. The poroelastic model consists of two equations: one describing the elasticity of the brain tissue and the other describing the changes in the interstitial tissue pressure. The model is applied on an idealized brain geometry, and it is found that infarcts with radius larger than approximately 14 mm and located near the lateral ventricle produce worse brain midline shift, measured through lateral ventricle compression. Furthermore, the model is also able to show the positive effect of DC treatment in reducing the brain midline shift by allowing part of the brain tissue to expand through the skull opening. However, the model does not show a decrease in the interstitial pressure during DC treatment. Further improvement and validation could enhance the capability of the proposed poroelastic model in predicting the occurrence of brain tissue swelling and DC treatment post ischaemia.

A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis study in comparing decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy in patients with acute subdural hematoma.

There are two controversial surgery methods which are traditionally used: craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and complications of DC versus craniotomy for surgical management in patients with acute subdural hemorrhage (SDH) following traumatic brain injury (TBI). We conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase up to July 30, 2023, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. Relevant articles were reviewed, with a focus on studies comparing decompressive craniectomy to craniotomy techniques in patients with SDH following TBI. Ten studies in 2401 patients were reviewed. A total of 1170 patients had a craniotomy, and 1231 had decompressive craniectomy. The mortality rate was not significantly different between the two groups (OR: 0.46 [95% CI: 0.42-0.5] P-value: 0.07). The rate of revision surgery was insignificantly different between the two groups (OR: 0.59 [95% CI: 0.49-0.69] P-value: 0.08). No significant difference was found between craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy regarding unilateral mydriasis (OR: 0.46 [95% CI: 0.35-0.57] P-value < 0.001). However, the craniotomy group had significantly lower rates of non-pupil reactivity (OR: 0.27 [95% CI: 0.17-0.41] P-value < 0.001) and bilateral mydriasis (OR: 0.59 [95% CI: 0.5-0.66] P-value: 0.04). There was also no significant difference in extracranial injury between the two groups, although the odds ratio of significant extracranial injury was lower in the craniotomy group (OR: 0.58 [95% CI: 0.45-0.7] P-value: 0.22). Our findings showed that non-pupil and bilateral-pupil reactivity were significantly more present in decompressive craniectomy. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding mortality rate, extracranial injury, revision surgery, and one-pupil reactivity.

Neuroprotection: Surgical approaches in traumatic brain injury.

Background: This review is centered on the pivotal role of surgical interventions within the comprehensive management of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Surgical strategies are indispensable components of TBI care, encompassing primary injury management and the alleviation of secondary injury processes, including the handling of intracranial hemorrhages (ICHs), contusions, and mass lesions. Methods: A systematic review was carried out by searching databases including PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. The inclusion criteria involved studies discussing surgical strategies for TBI, with a focus on primary injury management, ICHs, contusions, and mass lesions. More recent articles were prioritized, and data were synthesized to assess the impact of surgical interventions on TBI outcomes. Results: The evolution of surgical technologies has heralded a transformation in TBI management. These advancements encompass minimally invasive procedures, neuroimaging-guided surgeries, and robotic-assisted techniques, all geared toward optimizing patient outcomes. Conclusion: Surgical interventions within TBI care present unique challenges, such as timing considerations, patient selection criteria, and postoperative care. This review underscores the critical significance of multidisciplinary collaboration among neurosurgeons, neurologists, and critical care specialists. Such collaboration is essential to tailor surgical strategies to the individualized needs of patients. Moreover, the review highlights emerging trends in TBI surgery and underscores the ongoing imperative of research endeavors aimed at refining surgical protocols and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.

Swiss trial of decompressive craniectomy versus best medical treatment of spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage (SWITCH): an international, multicentre, randomised-controlled, two-arm, assessor-blinded trial.

RATIONALE: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is beneficial in people with malignant middle cerebral artery infarction. Whether DC improves outcome in spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is unknown. AIM: To determine whether DC without haematoma evacuation plus best medical treatment (BMT) in people with ICH decreases the risk of death or dependence at 6 months compared to BMT alone. METHODS AND DESIGN: SWITCH is an international, multicentre, randomised (1:1), two-arm, open-label, assessor-blinded trial. Key inclusion criteria are age ⩽75 years, stroke due to basal ganglia or thalamic ICH that may extend into cerebral lobes, ventricles or subarachnoid space, Glasgow coma scale of 8-13, NIHSS score of 10-30 and ICH volume of 30-100 mL. Randomisation must be performed <66 h after onset and DC <6 h after randomisation. Both groups will receive BMT. Participants randomised to the treatment group will receive DC of at least 12 cm in diameter according to institutional standards. SAMPLE SIZE: A sample of 300 participants randomised 1:1 to DC plus BMT versus BMT alone provides over 85% power at a two-sided alpha-level of 0.05 to detect a relative risk reduction of 33% using a chi-squared test. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is the composite of death or dependence, defined as modified Rankin scale score 5-6 at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include death, functional status, quality of life and complications at 180 days and 12 months. DISCUSSION: SWITCH will inform physicians about the outcomes of DC plus BMT in people with spontaneous deep ICH, compared to BMT alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02258919.

New perspectives on assessment and understanding of the patient with cranial bone defect: a morphometric and cerebral radiodensity assessment.

Background: Skull defects after decompressive craniectomy (DC) cause physiological changes in brain function and patients can have neurologic symptoms after the surgery. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether there are morphometric changes in the cortical surface and radiodensity of brain tissue in patients undergoing cranioplasty and whether those variables are correlated with neurological prognosis. Methods: This is a prospective cohort with 30 patients who were submitted to cranioplasty and followed for 6 months. Patients underwent simple head CT before and after cranioplasty for morphometric and cerebral radiodensity assessment. A complete neurological exam with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), modified Rankin Scale, and the Barthel Index was performed to assess neurological prognosis. Results: There was an improvement in all symptoms of the syndrome of the trephined, specifically for headache (p = 0.004) and intolerance changing head position (p = 0.016). Muscle strength contralateral to bone defect side also improved (p = 0.02). Midline shift of intracranial structures decreased after surgery (p = 0.004). The Anterior Distance Difference (ADif) and Posterior Distance Difference (PDif) were used to assess morphometric changes and varied significantly after surgery. PDif was weakly correlated with MMSE (p = 0.03; r = -0.4) and Barthel index (p = 0.035; r = -0.39). The ratio between the radiodensities of gray matter and white matter (GWR) was used to assess cerebral radiodensity and was also correlated with MMSE (p = 0.041; r = -0.37). Conclusion: Morphological anatomy and radiodensity of the cerebral cortex can be used as a tool to assess neurological prognosis after DC.